HyperWiki

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision 		Previous revision
en:philosophy:against_enforced_digitalization [2024/06/18 13:48]
throgh 		en:philosophy:against_enforced_digitalization [2024/06/18 13:52] (current)
throgh [Conclusion]
Line 37: Line 37:
 ===== Gateway to digital violence, hatred and harassment ===== ===== Gateway to digital violence, hatred and harassment =====
  
-We have already described the outgrowing imbalance of knowledge forms. Exactly this is another very important point why digital compulsion and enforced digital services and processes on people is a very bad and destructive concept. It is clear to see that with more services and the growing complexity of needed infrastructure and dependencies we will loose the same time participation. People are and / or will get overwhelmed over time, while younger generations perhaps are direct suited for a possible span of time until they will also be confronted with the outgrow. This concept includes a gateway to digital violence and discrimination. And this includes even to be amused by the ignorance and lack of information, making fun out of others, blame them direct. Or we really think it is civilized when we re-establish the medieval pillory on the global network? And there are concepts beyond getting more worse over time, like harassing groups and individuals until they withdraw from any communication on a platform / service or the global network in a whole. This leaves the question if we as mankind are able to learn out our own history: Shortened information, half-truths, hearsay, conspiracy belief, lies and myths are not helpful on the way for digital self-determination and technical emancipation. +We have already described the outgrowing imbalance of knowledge forms. Exactly this is another very important point why digital compulsion and enforced digital services and processes on people is a very bad and destructive concept. It is clear to see that with more services and the growing complexity of needed infrastructure and dependencies we will loose the same time participation. People are and / or will get overwhelmed over time, while younger generations perhaps are direct suited for a possible span of time until they will also be confronted with the outgrow. This concept includes a gateway to digital violence and discrimination. And this includes even to be amused by the ignorance and lack of information, making fun out of others, blame them direct. Or do we really think it is civilized when we re-establish the medieval pillory on the global network? And there are concepts beyond getting more worse over time, like harassing groups and individuals until they withdraw from any communication on a platform / service or the global network in a whole. This leaves the question if we as mankind are able to learn out our own history: Shortened information, half-truths, hearsay, conspiracy belief, lies and myths are not helpful on the way for digital self-determination and technical emancipation. 
  
 ===== Conclusion ===== ===== Conclusion =====
  
-Is it just a luxury problem to worry about surveillance? To enforce digitization will clearly lead to such results: We have already an imbalance of knowledge and competence. With the rise of even more services and platforms this will grow even further and outgrow our global society, leading to the question: Who is in control at last? Man or the machine? And do not get this wrong: There is no so-called "evil masterplan". It is a simple imbalance caused of ignorance and it is up to everyone individual to call for a stop-signal, first and foremost for the personal perspective. Taking a step backwards, is not that wrong especially when this imbalance is getting out of hands. And part of technical emancipation for Hyperbola is always that every user has full control over the system at any given time.+Is it just a luxury problem to worry about surveillance? To enforce digitization will clearly lead to such results: We have already an imbalance of knowledge and competence. With the rise of even more services and platforms this will grow even further and outgrow our global society, leading to the question: Who is in control at last? Man or the machine? And do not get this wrong: There is no so-called "evil masterplan". It is a simple imbalance caused of ignorance and it is up to everyone individual to call for a stop-signal, first and foremost for the personal perspective. Taking a step backwards is not that wrong especially when this imbalance is getting out of hands. And part of technical emancipation for Hyperbola is always that every user has full control over the system at any given time.