Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
en:philosophy:wording_phrases [2026/06/29 18:31] throgh |
en:philosophy:wording_phrases [2026/07/04 22:58] (current) throgh [So what does "non-free" mean for Hyperbola and is the software then really "non-free" or to be seen different?] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 174: | Line 174: | ||
| Hyperbola has never stated to be against **Rust** as language, but against a reference implementation with clear issues we underlined. That did not change for our perspective. We recognize and recognized the changes, but they are too small for us and not reaching the points given fully. Hyperbola is also not removing packages out of nothing. It is a normalized way that we first add a package initially out of needs and then later discover issues we cannot ignore. So we evaluate how a possible upgrade-path may look and if the work on patching could bring out solutions or more risks. | Hyperbola has never stated to be against **Rust** as language, but against a reference implementation with clear issues we underlined. That did not change for our perspective. We recognize and recognized the changes, but they are too small for us and not reaching the points given fully. Hyperbola is also not removing packages out of nothing. It is a normalized way that we first add a package initially out of needs and then later discover issues we cannot ignore. So we evaluate how a possible upgrade-path may look and if the work on patching could bring out solutions or more risks. | ||
| - | In general to summarize: When you disagree with the way we approach our system, you are clearly invited to reach out for other systems as there are enough for you to find one fitting. | + | In general to summarize: When you disagree with the way we approach our system, you are clearly invited to reach out for other systems as there are enough for you to find one fitting. |
| + | |||
| + | ===== So what does " | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hyperbola has a clear roadmap for software being included. Stating that a software is for us not fitting, means exactly that but also not more. We do not bother for others stating different or ignoring points. So yes, others may see therefore a project " | ||
| + | |||
| + | We define a project as **non-free** when: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * restrictions in the way of distribution, | ||
| + | * inclusion of further questionable and clear non-free interfaces (further links to third-party websites and services hosted for example) | ||
| + | * inclusion of non-free or only community-distributed but not fully free and libre provided frameworks (so-called " | ||
| + | * data is not provided under a free and libre, permissive licensing (software is only provided for us as a full package with everything, if data provided is not fully free we recognize the full project not as free and libre as source-code alone is not important for us, all data is) | ||
| + | * source-code is not offering all four freedoms given, we do not ask for permission when we see need for modifications | ||
| ===== Conclusion ===== | ===== Conclusion ===== | ||
| This article is written with the intention of clearing possible misguidance and misinterpretation. Hyperbola was, is and will be always a project oriented on democratic values. But this also means that Hyperbola is not supporting clear marked lies and propaganda resulting from shortened phrases and buzzwords. A democracy needs rules for orientation and not to grant the highest amount of egocentric will. Giving back means also to grant support and help for each other, to empower every member to overview possible risks and never stop learning. If you are same committed to those values and principles, feel welcome here at the project and in our community. If you decline the essentials written down, Hyperbola is not the place you want to engage. This may look like exclusion, but is in fact only the clear statement that anybody is asked to question own perspectives. Rules are not always perfect same way, so if there is a clear point seen we ask always for feedback and criticism. We turn against materialism and the disdain of the imagination, | This article is written with the intention of clearing possible misguidance and misinterpretation. Hyperbola was, is and will be always a project oriented on democratic values. But this also means that Hyperbola is not supporting clear marked lies and propaganda resulting from shortened phrases and buzzwords. A democracy needs rules for orientation and not to grant the highest amount of egocentric will. Giving back means also to grant support and help for each other, to empower every member to overview possible risks and never stop learning. If you are same committed to those values and principles, feel welcome here at the project and in our community. If you decline the essentials written down, Hyperbola is not the place you want to engage. This may look like exclusion, but is in fact only the clear statement that anybody is asked to question own perspectives. Rules are not always perfect same way, so if there is a clear point seen we ask always for feedback and criticism. We turn against materialism and the disdain of the imagination, | ||