Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
en:philosophy:trademarks [2024/01/17 01:05] throgh |
en:philosophy:trademarks [2024/01/17 15:06] (current) throgh [Are there really no solutions?] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| Hyperbola does not accept those questions for permission and therefore also rejects integration of software-projects following those methods. We see also possible further risks as this is not finally cleared up and only referenced towards " | Hyperbola does not accept those questions for permission and therefore also rejects integration of software-projects following those methods. We see also possible further risks as this is not finally cleared up and only referenced towards " | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Are there really no solutions? ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | As more than once underlined **full rebranding for the system is no solution**. It is a complete fork in work, not a script, not a command. And it could be told multiple times that this would be somewhat possible, it stays an illusion. Even rebranding and reworking smaller applications can be a massive amount of work. We don't and can't take this work! | ||
| + | |||
| + | Generic a fork is surely helping, when it includes also rebranding and changing the licensing to a really free, libre and permissive model. Relying just on top of projects to grant some rights without respecting all freedoms of the users and developers is not an option for Hyperbola. Others may see and handle that different! | ||