Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
en:philosophy:systemd_denial [2022/11/04 00:34] throgh [Conclusion for the Hyperbola-project] |
en:philosophy:systemd_denial [2022/11/18 12:37] (current) throgh [Points for criticism in detail] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
As Hyperbola is created as pure lightweight system the orientation of systemd is not following the [[: | As Hyperbola is created as pure lightweight system the orientation of systemd is not following the [[: | ||
- | With the essential design-decision being just more than only init and management systemd has also included more attack surfaces and further security-issues. To be mentioned there are dereferencing null pointers ([[https:// | + | With the essential design-decision being just more than only init and management systemd has also included more attack surfaces and further security-issues. To be mentioned there are dereferencing null pointers ([[https:// |
===== Back and forth: The role of init-systems ===== | ===== Back and forth: The role of init-systems ===== | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
We will never address criticism making usage of personal attacks as we conclude neither being unfair nor using false argumentation methods. Besides there are many points to be found making it further a problem to use systemd for any system with lightweight focus. | We will never address criticism making usage of personal attacks as we conclude neither being unfair nor using false argumentation methods. Besides there are many points to be found making it further a problem to use systemd for any system with lightweight focus. | ||
- | === Breaking promises | + | === Breaking promises === |
“After udev is merged into the systemd tree you can still build it for usage outside of systemd systems, and we will support these builds officially. In fact, we will be supporting this for a long time” | “After udev is merged into the systemd tree you can still build it for usage outside of systemd systems, and we will support these builds officially. In fact, we will be supporting this for a long time” | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
http:// | http:// | ||
- | === Stability | + | === Stability |
" | " | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
< | < | ||
- | === Scope creep === | + | === Scope of the project |
[[http:// | [[http:// | ||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
[[http:// | [[http:// | ||
- | === Absurd Bugs and Responses | + | === Problematic bugs and responses |
+ | |||
+ | [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[https:// | ||
=== Conceptional problems === | === Conceptional problems === | ||
- | === Scope Creep Leads to Vulnerabilities === | + | [[http:// |
- | === Poor design === | + | [[http:// |
- | === Ignorance of fundamental operating system concepts === | + | [[https:// |
+ | [[https:// | ||
- | ===== Conclusion for the Hyperbola-project ===== | + | [[https:// |
- | In the retrospective of all the points listed here Hyperbola has the stance not to accept systemd. It is just the point that there are better alternatives fitting within the approach of a lightweight and stable context for a modern operating-system based on the essentials of the Unix philosophy. It is not a denial as we for sure just see no usecase for a so complex and also bloated piece of software to be used. Our ideal in this: **We search for alternative ways as it is an an achievement of civilization that not all need to be the same but treated nevertheless with fairness as there is no need to have all the same!** | + | [[https:// |
+ | |||
+ | ===== Conclusion | ||
+ | With the retrospective of all the points listed here Hyperbola has the stance not to accept systemd. It is just the point that there are better alternatives fitting within the approach of a lightweight and stable context for a modern operating-system based on the essentials of the Unix philosophy. It is not a denial as we for sure just see no usecase for a so complex and also bloated piece of software to be used. Our ideal in this: **We search for alternative ways as it is an an achievement of civilization that not all need to be the same but treated nevertheless with fairness and therefore in conclusion the same way!** | ||
- | == Conceptional problems == | + | So systemd |
- | * [http:// | + | |
- | * [http:// | + | |
- | * [https:// | + | |
- | * [https:// | + | |
- | * [https:// | + | |
- | * [https:// | + | |
- | * [https:// | + | |
- | * [http:// | + | |
- | Debunking the myth of unit files being significantly shorter than scripts used by all other init systems: [https:// | + | |
- | == Scope Creep Leads to Vulnerabilities == | + | |
- | * [http:// | + | |
- | * To run systemd properly | + | |
- | ** [https:// | + | |
- | ** [https:// | + | |
- | * [https:// | + | |
- | == Poor design == | + | |
- | * [https:// | + | |
- | * [http:// | + | |
- | * [https:// | + | |
- | * http:// | + | |
- | * https:// | + | |
- | * https:// | + | |
- | * https:// | + | |
- | * https:// | + | |
- | == Ignorance of fundamental operating system concepts == | + | |
- | * [http:// | + | |
- | * [https:// | + |